The Governor of Arizona signed the bill that enforces the immigration law in Arizona, yesterday. The one thing I can say is YEPPY! A group of politicians want to actually enforce the law, that is unusual this day and age.
The law highlights...
A) It will require anyone whom police suspect to be here illegally to produce proof of citizenship (green card).
B) Prohibits the impeding of traffic to pick up day laborers.
C) Prohibits employing illegal aliens, fines employers big.
Why would anyone be opposed to enforcing the laws of this country? Well lets go over the arguments against the law....
A) "laments that Arizona lawmakers and the executive branch didn't take into account immigrants' contributions - economically, socially and culturally."
"The criminalization isn't the path to resolve the undocumented-immigration phenomenon," the statement added. That is a statement from the Mexican Government.
I think that the Arizona lawmakers did take into account the economic, social, and culture issues that illegal immigrants bring (ie: drugs, murder, hospital overcrowding, spending public monies, etc). Not all the Mexican culture is bad but let's weed out the criminal culture that is what the law is doing. By the way "Mexican government" you also say "criminalization is not the answer"....to late, it is already a crime to come into this country illegally.
B) "This is the most reprehensible thing since the Japanese internment," said Alfredo Gutierrez, a former state senator and community leader. "This is the saddest day for me. It's shameful."
When the Democrats interned the Japanese during World War 2 that truly was shameful, because the Japanese did not break the law....Illegal Mexicans on the other hand....
C) “Governor Brewer caved to the radical fringe,” a statement by the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund said, predicting that the law would create “a spiral of pervasive fear, community distrust, increased crime and costly litigation, with nationwide repercussions.”
If the "radical fringe" is hardworking American (Arizona) citizens and legal Mexican immigrants then yes she caved to them , that is why she is paid.I think the fear of being murdered, the distrust of kidnappers and the crime that is already being committed by illegal aliens deserves action by a government. The federal government isn't doing anything.
D) Speaking at a naturalization ceremony for 24 active-duty service members in the Rose Garden, he called for a federal overhaul of immigration laws, which Congressional leaders signaled they were preparing to take up soon, to avoid “irresponsibility by others.”
The Arizona law, he added, threatened “to undermine basic notions of fairness that we cherish as Americans, as well as the trust between police and our communities that is so crucial to keeping us safe.” B. Hussein Obama
The setting of his speech is terribly wrong in this situation. He is speaking before a group of LEGAL soldiers who are being naturalized, and he is talking about fairness. These soldiers have went through the steps to become citizens, unlike the illegal people in Arizona. So who is being fair? Who is is being irresponsible? The federal government that is who is unfair. Allowing for this travesty to occur for a century, and doing nothing. If you are a legal citizen of Arizona (and the Untied States) and happen to be Mexican I believe you would rather have to show proof of citizenship they being threatened by drug cartels or murdered on their own land. So who do you want it fair for, B.H.O.,the people in this country ILLEGALLY?
This is a good law enacted by a state in this country that is under siege from illegal immigrants, with a federal government which refused to do anything to help the situation. What else are they supposed to do? I guess the answer from the President is that it is better to be illegal.
The law highlights...
A) It will require anyone whom police suspect to be here illegally to produce proof of citizenship (green card).
B) Prohibits the impeding of traffic to pick up day laborers.
C) Prohibits employing illegal aliens, fines employers big.
Why would anyone be opposed to enforcing the laws of this country? Well lets go over the arguments against the law....
A) "laments that Arizona lawmakers and the executive branch didn't take into account immigrants' contributions - economically, socially and culturally."
"The criminalization isn't the path to resolve the undocumented-immigration phenomenon," the statement added. That is a statement from the Mexican Government.
I think that the Arizona lawmakers did take into account the economic, social, and culture issues that illegal immigrants bring (ie: drugs, murder, hospital overcrowding, spending public monies, etc). Not all the Mexican culture is bad but let's weed out the criminal culture that is what the law is doing. By the way "Mexican government" you also say "criminalization is not the answer"....to late, it is already a crime to come into this country illegally.
B) "This is the most reprehensible thing since the Japanese internment," said Alfredo Gutierrez, a former state senator and community leader. "This is the saddest day for me. It's shameful."
When the Democrats interned the Japanese during World War 2 that truly was shameful, because the Japanese did not break the law....Illegal Mexicans on the other hand....
C) “Governor Brewer caved to the radical fringe,” a statement by the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund said, predicting that the law would create “a spiral of pervasive fear, community distrust, increased crime and costly litigation, with nationwide repercussions.”
If the "radical fringe" is hardworking American (Arizona) citizens and legal Mexican immigrants then yes she caved to them , that is why she is paid.I think the fear of being murdered, the distrust of kidnappers and the crime that is already being committed by illegal aliens deserves action by a government. The federal government isn't doing anything.
D) Speaking at a naturalization ceremony for 24 active-duty service members in the Rose Garden, he called for a federal overhaul of immigration laws, which Congressional leaders signaled they were preparing to take up soon, to avoid “irresponsibility by others.”
The Arizona law, he added, threatened “to undermine basic notions of fairness that we cherish as Americans, as well as the trust between police and our communities that is so crucial to keeping us safe.” B. Hussein Obama
The setting of his speech is terribly wrong in this situation. He is speaking before a group of LEGAL soldiers who are being naturalized, and he is talking about fairness. These soldiers have went through the steps to become citizens, unlike the illegal people in Arizona. So who is being fair? Who is is being irresponsible? The federal government that is who is unfair. Allowing for this travesty to occur for a century, and doing nothing. If you are a legal citizen of Arizona (and the Untied States) and happen to be Mexican I believe you would rather have to show proof of citizenship they being threatened by drug cartels or murdered on their own land. So who do you want it fair for, B.H.O.,the people in this country ILLEGALLY?
This is a good law enacted by a state in this country that is under siege from illegal immigrants, with a federal government which refused to do anything to help the situation. What else are they supposed to do? I guess the answer from the President is that it is better to be illegal.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments on Plumb and Square are moderated. Comments made within 7 days of the posting will post right away. If you make a comment after 7 days of the posting, the comment will not post right away. I will be notified of your comment and I will approve the comment. I do not discriminate, I will post favorable and unfavorable comments. I will not post "sales" comments.
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.